Research Camp 1
Systematic literature review camp
Systematic literature reviews (SLRs) typically take 6–12 weeks. Participants run the same review with three AI agents and compare the results. For health economics and outcomes research (HEOR), health technology assessment (HTA), and clinical trial teams.
Free admission · Limited spots, highly selective · Deadline: Mar 27, 2026
Program steps
Hands-on and project-based, from question to publication-ready manuscript.
Step 1
Run a systematic literature review
From the research question, framed as population, intervention, comparator, and outcome (PICO), through a workflow reported to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses), to a manuscript.
Step 2
Repeat it with three approaches
The same review, with different AI agents and tools, to compare approaches.
Step 3
Compare the three runs
Speed, accuracy, and reproducibility across all three.
Step 4
Refine the workflow
Turn the findings into a reliable AI-assisted review workflow.
Step 5
Present the results
A short demo video of your approach and results.
Deliverables
Plus potential co-authorship on published work.
Manuscript draft
A publication-ready systematic literature review.
Comparison of AI tools
A comparative analysis of AI agents and review tools.
Video demo
A portfolio-ready demo of your workflow and results.
What participants learn
Shorter review timelines
Learn where AI workflows can cut review time from months to days.
Limits of AI in reviews
See where AI excels — and where it breaks — in real research workflows.
Auditable review pipelines
AI-assisted research pipelines designed to meet regulatory standards.