Keiji AI LogoKeiji AI

Clinical Development & Operations · Compare

TrialMind vs Citeline Sitetrove+ vs Tempus TIME

Site selection and patient recruitment tools, side by side. Pick any product to compare.

TrialMind vs Citeline Sitetrove+ vs Tempus TIME: site selection and patient recruitment tools compared, from each company’s public pages, checked 2026-10-29
TrialMindKeiji AIAI agents for clinical operationsCiteline (Norstella)Site and investigator databaseTempus AIOncology AI and trial network
Best forSites, criteria and patient screening on your own data, in your environmentFinding and comparing investigators and sites in a large curated databaseOncology trials enrolled through Tempus's provider network, with Deep 6 EMR patient finding
Patients
Patient matchingYes: Criteria become rules, with exclusion reasonsSeparate product, Citeline PatientMatch1Yes: Mines structured and unstructured EMR data2
Data it runs onYour data, registered trials, site history580K+ investigators, 208K+ sites, curated1EMR data from cancer centers2
Patient data stays in placeYes: Runs in your environmentNo patient records described1Not stated publicly2
Own site or patient networkNo: Uses data you hold or licenseSite and investigator data only1Yes: TIME sites; 40+ phase I centers3
Study design
Site selectionYes: Ranked for enrollment and diversityYes: Site scores, investigator tiers, side-by-side1Partly: Activates TIME sites in days or weeks3
Eligibility criteria designYes: Drafted from comparable registered trialsNot stated publicly1Not stated publicly2
Monitoring and evidence
Risk-based monitoringYes: Site risk scores, KRIs, data checksNot stated publicly1Not stated publicly3
Published validationTrialGPT (Nature Communications), FRAMM (Patterns)Partly: Vendor: site scores validated on trials1Not stated publicly2

From each company’s public pages, checked 2026-10-29. A dash means the company does not say.

See TrialMind on your own question

A 30-minute walkthrough on a study like yours, with sources and code you can check.