Keiji AI LogoKeiji AI

Clinical Development & Operations · Compare

TrialMind vs Citeline Sitetrove+ vs TriNetX LIVE

Site selection and patient recruitment tools, side by side. Pick any product to compare.

TrialMind vs Citeline Sitetrove+ vs TriNetX LIVE: site selection and patient recruitment tools compared, from each company’s public pages, checked 2026-10-29
TrialMindKeiji AIAI agents for clinical operationsCiteline (Norstella)Site and investigator databaseTriNetXFederated real-world data platform
Best forSites, criteria and patient screening on your own data, in your environmentFinding and comparing investigators and sites in a large curated databaseTesting criteria and finding sites on a federated EHR network
Patients
Patient matchingYes: Criteria become rules, with exclusion reasonsSeparate product, Citeline PatientMatch1Yes: Finds sites with eligible patients2
Data it runs onYour data, registered trials, site history580K+ investigators, 208K+ sites, curated1EHR data, 309M+ patient lives3
Patient data stays in placeYes: Runs in your environmentNo patient records described1Yes: Federated; patient data stays at source3
Own site or patient networkNo: Uses data you hold or licenseSite and investigator data only1Yes: 14,200+ clinical sites3
Study design
Site selectionYes: Ranked for enrollment and diversityYes: Site scores, investigator tiers, side-by-side1Yes: Site and investigator insights4
Eligibility criteria designYes: Drafted from comparable registered trialsNot stated publicly1Yes: Tests criteria on real patient data4
Monitoring and evidence
Risk-based monitoringYes: Site risk scores, KRIs, data checksNot stated publicly1Not stated publicly2
Published validationTrialGPT (Nature Communications), FRAMM (Patterns)Partly: Vendor: site scores validated on trials1Partly: Vendor case study4

From each company’s public pages, checked 2026-10-29. A dash means the company does not say.

See TrialMind on your own question

A 30-minute walkthrough on a study like yours, with sources and code you can check.