Keiji AI LogoKeiji AI

Clinical Development & Operations · Compare

TrialMind vs Tempus TIME vs TriNetX LIVE

Site selection and patient recruitment tools, side by side. Pick any product to compare.

TrialMind vs Tempus TIME vs TriNetX LIVE: site selection and patient recruitment tools compared, from each company’s public pages, checked 2026-10-29
TrialMindKeiji AIAI agents for clinical operationsTempus AIOncology AI and trial networkTriNetXFederated real-world data platform
Best forSites, criteria and patient screening on your own data, in your environmentOncology trials enrolled through Tempus's provider network, with Deep 6 EMR patient findingTesting criteria and finding sites on a federated EHR network
Patients
Patient matchingYes: Criteria become rules, with exclusion reasonsYes: Mines structured and unstructured EMR data1Yes: Finds sites with eligible patients2
Data it runs onYour data, registered trials, site historyEMR data from cancer centers1EHR data, 309M+ patient lives3
Patient data stays in placeYes: Runs in your environmentNot stated publicly1Yes: Federated; patient data stays at source3
Own site or patient networkNo: Uses data you hold or licenseYes: TIME sites; 40+ phase I centers4Yes: 14,200+ clinical sites3
Study design
Site selectionYes: Ranked for enrollment and diversityPartly: Activates TIME sites in days or weeks4Yes: Site and investigator insights5
Eligibility criteria designYes: Drafted from comparable registered trialsNot stated publicly1Yes: Tests criteria on real patient data5
Monitoring and evidence
Risk-based monitoringYes: Site risk scores, KRIs, data checksNot stated publicly4Not stated publicly2
Published validationTrialGPT (Nature Communications), FRAMM (Patterns)Not stated publicly1Partly: Vendor case study5

From each company’s public pages, checked 2026-10-29. A dash means the company does not say.

See TrialMind on your own question

A 30-minute walkthrough on a study like yours, with sources and code you can check.