Real-World Evidence · Compare
TrialMind vs Flatiron Health
Real-world evidence platforms, side by side. Pick any product to compare.
| TrialMindKeiji AIAI agents for RWE studies | Flatiron HealthOncology real-world data and AI | |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Plain-language studies on data you already license, with reviewable code | Deep oncology data with a long regulatory track record |
| Data | ||
| Data source | Claims, EHR, registry and genomic data you license | 6M+ EHR-derived oncology records1 |
| Runs on data you already license | Yes: OMOP or your own schemas | Not stated publicly: Runs on Flatiron oncology data1 |
| Where data stays | Your environment; raw records not moved | Not stated publicly1 |
| Analysis | ||
| Plain-language cohorts | Yes: Describe the study, review the plan | Yes: Telescope turns criteria into cohorts2 |
| Audit trail and code | Yes: Attrition table plus SQL, Python or R | Not stated publicly: Live counts, attrition, pre-built analyses2 |
| Fit | ||
| Regulatory use, as the vendor states it | Audit trail; GxP-qualified Data Science Assistant | 45+ regulatory decisions since 20183 |
| Academic licensing | Yes: Group, department or institution licenses | Not stated publicly: Life sciences, oncology practices, health systems4 |
From each company’s public pages, checked 2026-10-21. A dash means the company does not say.
More comparisons
See TrialMind on your own question
A 30-minute walkthrough on a study like yours, with sources and code you can check.
Sources · checked 2026-10-21
Product details come from each company’s public pages. Spotted something out of date? Tell us and we will correct it.